2024 – Resolving the controversy surrounding the value of the on-axis magnetic safety factor during the sawtooth cycle

Resolving the controversy surrounding the value of the on-axis magnetic safety factor during the sawtooth cycle

2024 Research Campaign, Transient Control

Purpose of Experiment

Create a plasma that shows a sawtooth cycle with q(0)~0.7 instead of q(0)~1.0 to verify theoretical predictions for sawtooth activity near q(0)=0.7 and confirm that long−debated measurements of q(0)~0.7 are valid. For reaching q(0)~0.7 the 1/1 mode, which is responsible for the commonly observed (Kadomtsev) sawtooth cycle, has to be stabilized. This can be achieved by using a circular plasma shape with an on−axis peaked current profile.

This experiment has been designed based on predictions for a m/n=2/3 instability that can explain historical sawtooth instability observations in which q(0)~0.7 was found instead of q(0)~1 [Smiet
et al. Nucl. Fusion 60 (2020) 084005]. The ideas for stabilizing the m/n=1/1 sawtooth cycle were presented in [Bussac et al. PRL 35 (1975) 1638] where a toroidal plasma with a circular plasma cross section were considered.

This experiment should resolve a 30 year controversy for the value of q(0) and hopefully shows that tokamak plasmas can exhibit sawtooth cycles with q(0)~0.7 and with q(0)~1.0.

Experimental Approach

Create a circular plasma and let it Ohmically evolve to a sawtoothing plasma. When the plasma is sawtoothing during the flat top inject co−NBI for MSE CER measurements. The co−NBI can be increased further to help stabilize the 1/1 mode through fast−ion and toroidal rotation stabilization. If that is insufficient to stabilize the 1/1 sawtooth on−axis ECCD might be tried to drive enough current inside the q=1 radius to stabilize the 1/1 mode.
Repeat the circular shot but change the plasma ellipticity slowly (in 2−3 sec) from 1.0 to ~1.4 during the steady state phase after the 2/3 sawtooth instability is well established. During the ellipticity ramp the 1/1 mode should become unstable and the 2/3 sawtooth activity should change into the 1/1 sawtooth. Signs for this change is a sudden increase in sawtooth period and amplitude. If we don’t observe a sawtooth period change and if MSE does not indicate that q(0)=0.7 we can try to lower q(0) down to 0.7 by driving drive extra current at the magnetic axis with ECCD.
See more details, including project leads, at U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI).